The Use of Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation.
__Ann. Rev. of Linguistics, Vol. 7 (Invited submission; forthcoming 2020).
Varieties of ordinary meaning: Comments on Kevin P. Tobia, “Testing Ordinary Meaning: An Experimental Assessment of What Dictionary Definitions and Linguistic Usage Data Tell Legal Interpreters”
A (mostly corpus-based) linguistic reexamination of District of Columbia v. Heller and the Second Amendment.
Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation: When Is It (In)appropriate?
A Lawyer’s Introduction to Meaning in the Framework of Corpus Linguistics
__2017 BYU L. Rev. 1359 (2018) (link).
“Always speaking”? Interpreting the Present Tense in Statutes.
__Canadian Review of Linguistics 58(1): 63-83 (peer reviewed).