Toward Shared Assumptions Regarding the Use of Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation

The Use of Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation.
__Annual Review of Linguistics. 7:473-491 (invited submission).


Varieties of ordinary meaning: Comments on Kevin P. Tobia, “Testing Ordinary Mean­ing”


A (mostly corpus-based) linguistic reexamination of District of Columbia v. Heller and  the Second Amendment.

Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation: When Is It (In)appropriate?


A Lawyer’s Introduction to Meaning in the Framework of Corpus Lin­guistics
__2017 BYU L. Rev. 1359 (2018) (link).


“Always speaking”? Interpreting the Present Tense in Statutes.
__Canadian Review of Linguistics 58(1): 63-83 (peer reviewed).
__SSRN (preprint).



Usage restriction regarding The Use of Corpus Linguistics in Legal Interpretation, 2021, Ann. Rev. of Ling., 7:473-491: Any further/multiple distribution, publication, or commercial usage of this copyrighted material requires submission of a permission request addressed to the Copyright Clearance Center (